Tag Archives: Daily Bible Study

June 7, 2019 Bible Study — Setting the Stage

I am using the daily Bible reading schedule from “The Bible.net” for my daily Bible reading.

Today, I am reading and commenting on Esther 1-3.

The Book of Esther is in many ways a perfect model for storytelling.  Each of the first three chapters is a self-contained story which sets up the one which follows.   Each one of them contains lessons we can learn from.  The first chapter can be used to illustrate many mistakes which can be made in a marriage relationship.  However, I believe that only one of them was put there on purpose by the writer.  Herodotus wrote that when the Persians had a big decision to make they would get drunk and debate what should be done.  Then when they sobered up they would review their decision, and only if it still seemed like a good idea would they implement it.  In this story, King Xerxes and his advisers made a decision while they were drunk, and immediately implemented it.  The decision making process described by Herodotus may have some merit, if used carefully.  The decision making process described here will lead to many regrets, as we see in the next chapter.

The second chapter builds upon the first.  King Xerxes came to regret his decision to depose Queen Vashti.  His advisers came up with a plan to avoid losing their position for giving him advice he regretted.  Again, there are many lessons which this passage can be used to illustrate, but there are only two  to which I want to pay particular attention.  When Esther was brought into the king;s harem, she was humble and friendly.  She acted in a manner which earned her the friendship of the eunuch in charge of the king’s harem.  She could have been haughty and dismissive of the eunuch as many beautiful women would have done.  Or she could have been resentful and angry towards him, as many other women would do in a similar situation.  (Note: I am not saying that these are failings which are unique to women).  Instead, Esther acted in a way which earned the man’s friendship.  Then when she was called to the king’s bed, she took the eunuch’s advice.  She did not connive or scheme how she could manipulate the king.  Once gain she displayed humility and friendliness, which earned her the king’s favor.

The first two chapters were introduction.  They set the stage.  Here in the third chapter the story actually starts.  The chapter begins by introducing the last of its characters, Haman.  The first thing we come across is that Mordecai got away with not obeying the king’s command to bow to Haman, which brings us to the second lesson from the second chapter.  Mordecai could do this because he had demonstrated his loyalty to the king by revealing a plot to assassinate the king.  If Haman had tried to punish Mordecai, he would have been revealed as the petty man that he was and because Mordecai had revealed his loyalty to the king previously doing so might have also cost him his postion.  So, when Haman realized that he could not make a direct example of Mordecai, he sought another way to make him pay.  And Haman had the power and cunning to pull off this plan.  He was able to convince the king, through slander and bribery, to allow him to order the death of all of the Jews, which only “incidentally” included loyal Mordecai.  Which gives us a fourth lesson.  Standing up to powerful people may cost us a price we did not anticipate.

June 6, 2019 Bible Study

I am using the daily Bible reading schedule from “The Bible.net” for my daily Bible reading.

Today, I am reading and commenting on Nehemiah 11-13.

Earlier in the Book of Nehemiah, when the wall around Jerusalem was first completed, Nehemiah had noted that few people lived within the city and most of those who did were government officials.  At no point does it explicitly address this, but the implication was that there were not enough people in the city for it to be economically viable.  Today’s passage begins with the solution Nehemiah came up with to this problem.  He had the Returned Exiles living in villages outside of Jerusalem all draw lots for a few from each village to move to Jerusalem.  Those who remained in the villages provided support so that those who moved to Jerusalem could afford to do so.  This provides a model upon which much modern missionary work is supported.

The Book of Nehemiah ends with what appears to be a hard-line approach to Jews marrying non-Jews, or even to non-Jews joining and becoming part of the Jewish people.  When Nehemiah returned to Jerusalem and resumed his governorship over Judea, he expelled all of those of foreign descent from the assembly.  However, this took place after it was discovered that the priest put in charge of the Temple storerooms had made one of the larger storerooms available to Tobiah for storage.  Tobiah was one of the non-Jewish local officials who had opposed Nehemiah’s restoration of Jerusalem.  The storeroom turned over for Tobiah’s use had been intended as a storage room for offerings given for the support of priests and Levites working in the Temple.  As a result of its misappropriation many of the Levites had been forced to leave Temple service in order to support themselves.  In addition, in Nehemiah’s absence many of the leaders of the Jewish people had resumed doing business on the Sabbath, despite having signed the “confession of faith” where they stated they would not do so.  So, overall, this hard-line stance came in response to the fact that rather than demanding that those who wished to join with them in worshiping God abandon all of their pagan practices, the Jewish people had begun adopting some of those practices.  I want to note that it is likely that Tobiah wanted a room in the Temple to store his goods because by doing so he could bypass taxes on those goods.  

June 5, 2019 Bible Study The People Confess Their Sins and Make a Plan To Do Better

I am using the daily Bible reading schedule from “The Bible.net” for my daily Bible reading.

Today, I am reading and commenting on Nehemiah 9-10.

A few weeks after completing the Festival of Shelters the Returned Exiles gathered once more in an assembly.  This time they gathered to grieve over and confess the sins of themselves and their ancestors.  As part of this exercise they stood and listened to a reading of the entire Book of the Law which took three hours.  Then when the reading was completed they spent three more hours standing there confessing their sins and worshiping God.  The passage does not describe what that was like, but I have an image of what happened based on the prayer of confession which the Levitical leasers prayed.  I imagine that the leaders read out excerpts from Exodus through Chronicles of the sins which the people of Israel had committed, interspersed with songs and opportunities for the people to think over their own lives and how they had failed to obey God’s Laws just as their ancestors had failed.  As part of their confession they acknowledged that God had repeatedly given their ancestors opportunities, which they and their ancestors had squandered in their wickedness.

At the conclusion of this six hour service the leaders of the people presented a document which they had prepared to the people.  This document was a confession of faith which the leaders had all signed and which they called on the people to affirm.  This confession of faith highlighted areas where they believed that failure would lead to all of the other sins which they and their ancestors had committed.  Further they believed that following the practices laid out in the document would make them and their descendants more likely to obey all of God’s commands.  So, they did not just grieve over what they had done wrong.  They made a plan to do better and committed themselves to follow that plan.  To my mind the confession of faith had three key elements.  First, they agreed not to intermarry with those who did not subscribe to this confession of faith.  Second, while they would not prevent outsiders from doing business on the Sabbath, they would not do so themselves, not even with those outsiders.  Third, they committed themselves to an annual tax for the maintenance of the Temple and its priests.   

June 4, 2019 Bible Study — The Returned Exiles Celebrate the Festival of Shelters

I am using the daily Bible reading schedule from “The Bible.net” for my daily Bible reading.

Today, I am reading and commenting on Nehemiah 7-8.

When the wall around Jerusalem was rebuilt, Nehemiah delegated governing the city to his brother and another trusted subordinate.  Reading the instructions he gave them suggests that he wanted Jerusalem to be like a gated community.  No one to be allowed into the city without giving a valid reason for doing so.  Further, he set up what sounds an awful lot like a neighborhood watch for the entire city: “Appoint the residents of Jerusalem to act as guards, everyone on a regular watch. Some will serve at sentry posts and some in front of their own homes.”  This leads me further down my interpretation about the Returned Exiles having once before this rebuilt the walls of Jerusalem.  The walls and gates had been destroyed because a criminal element had been coming in and out of Jerusalem, using its lack of secure governance as a way to launder stolen goods and bypass taxes.  Related to that, I think that was why Nehemiah registered who actually lived in the city.  I think when the walls were completed and everyone had to pass through a check point where they were identified that he was surprised to realize how few people actually lived in the city.  This made him realize that many of those who had seemed to fill the city were doing things for which they would prefer no one knew they were in the city. 

Once the project to restore security to Jerusalem was completed and the workers from outside of Jerusalem had had a chance to put their lives back in order, the Returned Exiles gathered once more in Jerusalem for a festival.  As part of the gathering, Ezra the priest read the Law of Moses to the people and explained what God commanded them to do in it.  The people responded in much the same way that King Josiah had before the Exile.  They mourned the failure of themselves and their ancestors to obey God’s Laws.  They did so to such an extent that their leaders needed to remind them that they had gathered, according to that same Law, to worship God and celebrate the great and wonderful things He had done for them.   The people responded to this command from their leaders because they realized what a wonderful thing it was to be able to hear and understand what God’s word for them was.  

We should encourage new believers to follow the example set here.  They should rejoice that they have learned God’s will for their lives and celebrate that He has offered them an opportunity to be transformed by His love.  Even the part where the following day the people discovered the Festival of Shelters offers a model.  It is good for new believers to spend some extended time away from their ordinary cares in fellowship with those who worship and obey God when they first come to know the Lord.

June 3, 2019 Bible Study — Virtue Is the Antidote to Corruption

I am using the daily Bible reading schedule from “The Bible.net” for my daily Bible reading.

Today, I am reading and commenting on Nehemiah 4-6.

When Nehemiah started construction work on the walls of Jerusalem, Sanballat and Tobiah were angered by the work and tried to discourage the workers.  Both Sanballat and Tobiah were officials of the Persian government and had seen Nehemiah’s letters from the King of Persia.  Neither Sanballat nor Tobiah had any official authority over Jerusalem.  However, both had unofficial interests there and their official positions had given them significant clout with those who had had authority in Jerusalem before Nehemiah’s arrival.  The passage does not spell it out, but I believe that at least part of their opposition to Nehemiah was related to his economic reforms.  An account of one of those economic reforms is sandwiched in between passages describing how Snaballat and Tobiah tried to intervene in Nehemiah’s governance of Jerusalem.

When Nehemiah became aware of how the wealthy were using their economic power to further impoverish the poor, he took action.  I am going to read between the lines a little bit here.  It appears that to one degree or another, the wealthy described here had built their wealth, at least in part, on the basis of being descended from those who had been taken into Exile from Jerusalem or the surrounding area.  However, they used that wealth to gain more wealth from other Returned Exiles who failed, for one reason or another, to capitalize on that heritage.  The wealthy were using their wealth to take advantage of the misfortunes of those who were not wealthy.  Rather than helping their coreligionists when they experienced misfortune, they were taking advantage of their misfortune.  The passage does not spell out the point I am about to make, but I think it fits what the passage does say.  The wealthy had gained their wealth because of favorable business arrangements which they were able to gain because they were members of the Returned Exiles.  However, rather than offer similar favorable arrangements with the less well off members of the Returned Exiles, they took advantage of their misfortunes to pad their own wealth.  Once they had gained their wealth they began to see themselves as having more in common with the corrupt officials of the surrounding peoples than with their fellow Jews. 

The corrupt officials among the surrounding peoples realized that they were going to be unable to stop Nehemiah from refortifying Jerusalem.  Further, he was convincing the Jews to close ranks and support each other rather than take part in the corrupt practices from which these officials profited.  So, they tried to set up a clandestine meeting with Nehemiah.  Again the passage does not say this, but the wording suggests to me that they implied an opportunity for Nehemiah to collaborate with them for both to profit.  Nehemiah, however, believed that they intended to ambush him if he went to the meeting.  When that failed, they attempted to blackmail Nehemiah with false accusations.  Again, the passage does not clearly say this, but the blackmail appears to have been, “Either cut a deal with us, or we will tell the King that you are plotting rebellion.”  That failed because Nehemiah was acting within the mandate he had received directly from the King of Persia and Nehemiah knew that it would take more than mere rumors and unsupported allegations to undermine his position.  They next attempted to take advantage of Nehemiah’s paranoia to make him an ineffective governor.  They hoped to get him to hide from assassins, which would have served the dual purposes of making him less aware of corruption among those under his authority and discredited him with his supporters for taking protective measures which were not available to them.

June 2, 2019 Bible Study — New Thoughts (For Me) About the Book of Nehemiah

I am using the daily Bible reading schedule from “The Bible.net” for my daily Bible reading.

Today, I am reading and commenting on Nehemiah 1-3.

As I read this today I thought about the news Nehemiah receives from those who recently visited Jerusalem.  When they tell him that the walls have been torn down and the gates destroyed by fire I have always understood that, and have even heard preachers preach, this goes back to the fall of Jerusalem.  If the walls of Jerusalem had never been rebuilt since the Babylonians sacked Jerusalem, this would not have been news to Nehemiah..  Which suggests that the walls of Jerusalem had been rebuilt earlier by the Returned Exiles, and torn down again.  It also puts the commission Nehemiah receives from the King of Persia in a different light.  Actually, it puts Nehemiah’s trepidation in making his request in a different light as well.  By asking permission to go and rebuild Jerusalem, Nehemiah risked the possibility that Jerusalem’s condition was actually the king’s policy and also risked suggesting that the king had failed to keep control over his kingdom.  This understanding also gives new insight into why the King of Persia sent a military bodyguard with Nehemiah.

My thoughts concerning the end of today’s passage go in a completely different direction.  Usually when I read this account of the people who rebuilt the different sections of the wall I wonder why I should care who built which portion.  However, today I noticed something I was aware of but never thought about before.  Many of the sections of Jerusalem’s walls were built by people who did not live in Jerusalem, or even very close to it.  When I paid attention to where the people were from, it reminded me of Mennonite Disaster Service crews going into an area after a disaster.  While some of the sections of the wall around Jerusalem were repaired by residents of Jerusalem, many of the work crews came from several days travel away.  The walls of Jerusalem were not rebuilt by people taking a few hours a day away from their normal activities.  Those who worked to rebuild the wall were not just people looking out for their own interests as would be the case if everyone who did so lived within the city.

June 1, 2019 Bible Study

I am using the daily Bible reading schedule from “The Bible.net” for my daily Bible reading.

Today, I am reading and commenting on Ezra 9-10.

This passage has always bothered me.  A casual reading suggests that the sin of which many of the Returned Exiles were guilty was marrying wives from outside of their group.  Further, the solution goes against one of my most deeply held beliefs: that marriage should always be for life.  However, the problem was NOT that some of the Returned Exiles had married women from among the locals.  The problem was that they were following the detestable practices of the local people.  They were taking part in the idolatrous worship practices of the pagans living in the land.  Rather than have these women convert to Judaism* and give up their pagan religions before marrying them, the Jewish men were trying to have it both ways; they continued to practice Judaism but also joined their wives in their pagan religion. 

*This is the first point in the Bible I am comfortable with using the term Judaism to refer to the religion of the Old Testament.  This is not because I think the practice or beliefs changed.  Rather it is at this point that the people who practiced this religion began identifying themselves as Jews and their religion as Judaism(although that last part might not be for another few centuries).

So, an assembly of all of those whose claim to property was based on being one of the Returned Exiles were summoned to an assembly in Jerusalem or risk forfeiting their property.  That sounds like a fairly severe penalty for not making a trip which might cause someone significant hardship.  However, they included a clause which stated that the forfeiture would only happen if the elders and leaders so decided.  Then when they got together to discuss what should be done about the problem of men of the assembly practicing idolatry because of their pagan wives.  They decided that all members of the assembly married to a pagan wife should divorce her and separate themselves from the people who practiced pagan rituals.  This sounds harsh, men must divorce their wives if those wives were not Jewish (that is, not one of those who returned from Exile.  However, this is where it gets interesting.  They decided that each man who had married a pagan wife should come before the elders at a scheduled time.  This suggests to me that it was not just a matter of divorce your wife or else.  I think the point of the meeting with the elders was to allow the man to argue that his formerly pagan wife had abandoned her pagan practices and converted to Judaism.

I would guess that some of these women continued, and encouraged their husbands to join them, in pagan practices because they did not understand the conflict between Judaism and their pagan practices.  When that conflict was made clear to them, many of those would have been willing to give up their pagan practices.

May 31, 2019 Bible Study — Giving Ourselves No Choice But To Rely On God

I am using the daily Bible reading schedule from “The Bible.net” for my daily Bible reading.

Today, I am reading and commenting on Ezra 6-8.

I am unsure why the letter sent to King Darius requesting that the Persian records be searched for Cyrus the Great’s edict was sent.  On the one hand, the overall passage suggests that the sender believed that the copy of the edict presented by the Jews was a forgery.  On the other hand, their reaction to King Darius’ reply to their letter suggest they may have been genuinely seeking clarification.  In either case, the reply from King Darius was unequivocal: the Jewish efforts to rebuild the Temple were not only to not be interfered with, they were to be supported to the full capability of the local government.  As a result, work moved forward on restoring the Temple and it was rapidly rebuilt.

Once they completed rebuilding and rededicating the Temple, the Returned Exiles conducted a Passover feast at the appropriate time.  Here we learn that despite having rejected the call to take part in the rebuilding effort from the locals, the Returned Exiles welcomed those who wished to do so to join them in worshiping God.  The key part of that welcome, one which we can learn from today, was that those who wished to join them needed to abandon the pagan practices which had been added on to the worship of God and follow the Law of Moses as practiced by the Returned Exiles.  I do not put that statement, “as practiced by the Returned Exiles”, in there to imply that the practice was not consistent with the Law of Moses.  Rather I include it to note that they did not hold the people of the land to a higher standard than they did themselves.  The fact that the Returned Exiles welcomed those locals who were willing to follow their practices supports the idea that the offered help to rebuild the Temple had been offered either in bad faith or as an effort to alter the worship practices described in the Law of Moses.

With Chapter 7 we begin the account of Ezra, after whom this book is named.  It is my belief that the material from here to the end of the book were based on a record written by Ezra himself with editorial content from the scribes who combined Ezra’s record with the material earlier in the book.  The letter from King Artaxerxes commissioning Ezra contains some interesting thoughts.  It mandates that Ezra be given gold and materials for use in the Temple.  These items were to be used to petition God to look favorably on Artaxerxes and to bless him.  While Artaxerxes did not express the position of a Believer that God is the Creator and Supreme over all, he did acknowledge that God had authority and power and requested that God be petitioned on his behalf.  We should do for our government officials what Artaxerxes requested of Ezra, whether they so request or not.  

Perhaps the biggest lesson we can learn from Ezra was about handling money and valuables dedicated to the Lord.  When Ezra realized how much wealth was being sent with his group to Jerusalem his first concern was security.  However, he was embarrassed to ask the king for soldiers to accompany them because he had been bragging about how God protected those who served Him.  We learn from this passage that until this moment, Ezra believed, but he did not have faith.  However, rather than admit to the king that he did not have the faith to rely on God, he chose to rely on God.  It is a lesson we can all learn from.  Sometimes we need to step out in faith that we don’t quite have.  He trapped himself into depending on God.  One must be careful about doing this, because we can easily find ourselves trying to trap God into doing our will.  We can trap ourselves into doing God’s will, but we cannot trap God into doing ours.  I will also note that Ezra did not do this on purpose.

May 30, 2019 Bible Study — Should We Accept the Help of Non-believers To Do God’s Will?

I am using the daily Bible reading schedule from “The Bible.net” for my daily Bible reading.

Today, I am reading and commenting on Ezra 3-5.

As soon as the Returned Exiles got themselves settled into their new homes, they rebuilt the altar and began offering sacrifices upon it.  The following spring the Returned Exiles began rebuilding the Temple.   When they completed the foundation of the Temple the people who had been living in the land during the Exile claimed a stake in the rebuilding of the Temple.  The local people claimed to have worshiped God since they were settled in the land by the Assyrians.  I have always read this passage and thought that the Returned Exiles should not have so bluntly rejected the offer of assistance.   However, today it struck me, if the locals had been worshiping God and offering Him sacrifices for all of these years, why didn’t they rebuild the Temple before this?  Further, as soon as their help was rejected the locals began working to disrupt the building project.  In fact, after Cyrus died, the locals reached out to the King of Persia and slandered the Returned Exiles by implying that they had begun restoring Jerusalem behind the back of the Persian authorities. 

Reading between the lines here we learn an important lesson about working with non-believers to carry out God’s will.  The locals offered to help the Returned Exiles, but considering the ways in which they immediately began working against the project when their help was rejected we see that their offer was not sincere.  Perhaps they wanted to be involved so as to have a say in how worship was carried out in the new Temple.  Or perhaps they were planning to frustrate the plans from the inside.  The key factor here is that the locals did not share the priorities of the Returned Exiles.  When non-believers offer to partner with believers to accomplish some goal, we must be very careful about accepting their aid because they do not share our desire to do God’s will.  Their reasons for seeking goals which they may have in common with us will be different from ours and they will attempt to redirect our efforts to further their other goals.

As I mentioned the local government officials not associated with the Returned Exiles had sent a letter to the King of Persia and received a reply ordering a halt to rebuilding the city of Jerusalem.  Initially, this also caused the Returned Exiles to cease work on the Temple.  However, after Darius took the throne, the prophets Haggai and Zechariah inspired the people to resume work on the Temple.  I find this interesting.  When the local government officials received orders from the King of Persia to halt the rebuilding, they intervened with sufficient force to stop the work.  However, when the rebuilding resumed, the local government officials refrained from using force to stop work.  The passage does not tell us what had changed besides who was King of Persia.  I suspect that a significant factor was that Darius was a king more in the mold of Cyrus, while the two kings who reigned in between ruled more with an iron-fist (incidentally, both of their reigns were relatively short).  If all parties were aware of this change in attitude at the top, the Returned Exiles would have been more willing to stand up for themselves and the local officials less willing to initiate a violent confrontation.  Under the intermediary kings, both parties would have been aware that imperial forces were likely to back up such a show of force.  Under Darius, the Returned Exiles would have had reason to believe they would get a chance to argue their side before imperial forces acted.  Additionally, it appears that someone among the Returned Exiles produced a copy of Cyrus’ decree authorizing their return.  It appears that the local officials suspected the copy was a forgery and hoped to use that as leverage on their side over the Returned Exiles

 

May 29, 2019 Bible Study — Support for the Historical Accuracy of the Old Testament

I am using the daily Bible reading schedule from “The Bible.net” for my daily Bible reading.

Today, I am reading and commenting on Ezra 1-2.

The first thing I want to note about the Book of Ezra is something which I learned earlier this year (perhaps I had read or heard this earlier, but, if so, I did not remember it).  The books of Ezra and Nehemiah had been one book in the Hebrew Bible.  They become separate books as a result of the fact that in the 2nd Century BC there were two separate, differing translations of the book into Greek.  I don’t want to spend more time on that today, but the way in which they became separated fascinates me.

Chapter One is consistent with the inscriptions which were discovered on what is known as the Cyrus Cylinder, a clay cylinder inscribed with a declaration from Cyrus declaring his support for the repatriation of peoples the Babylonians had taken into exile.  It also calls for the restoration of the temples of numerous gods throughout the territory which had been the Babylonian Empire and the return to those temples of the sacred objects which had been taken to Babylon.  While neither the Jews nor Jerusalem were mentioned on the Cyrus Cylinder, the inscription on the Cyrus Cylinder is consistent with what we find recorded here.  In fact, the Cyrus Cylinder makes a similar statement about Cyrus’ relationship to the chief god of the Babylonians as this passage says that he proclaimed about his relationship with God.  What is written in this passage is consistent with everything we know about the Persian Empire and how it dealt with the peoples under its control.  The Cyrus Cylinder was discovered at a time when many doubted that any of the events recorded in the Old Testament had actually happened.

The second chapter is a list of those who returned as part of Cyrus’ repatriation.  The important part about this was that they brought documents with them.  These documents included genealogies.  Those who could trace their ancestry to the genealogies of priests and Levites which they brought back were allowed to serve as such.  Those who could not were provisionally prevented from doing so.  However, those who returned acknowledged that their records were incomplete and allowed for asking God to guide them on whether these people should be allowed to serve.  At the time of the writing of this passage they had yet to restore the method if inquiry described in the Law of Moses, but they made a record of the people who thought they were descended from priests or Levites for whom confirmation could not be found.