I am using the daily Bible reading schedule from “The Bible.net” for my daily Bible reading.

Today, I am reading and commenting on 2 Kings 13-14.

Today’s passage mentions three descendants of Jehu who ruled over Israel, the Northern Kingdom. It says of each of them, “He did what was evil in the Lord’s sight.” Immediately following this it says that they continued the sins which Jeroboam had led Israel to commit. I have traditionally seen this interpreted as an explanation of what they did which was evil, but I realized today that the writer said that Jehu had continued those sins, but did not say that he did what was evil in God’s sight. This made me realize that continuing the worship of the calves which Jeroboam had built was a separate, less serious charge against these kings than doing evil in the Lord’s sight. I now realize that when the writer refers to people, either individually or as a group, doing evil in the Lord’s sight he does not mean idolatry even though he generally mentions idolatry right before or right after writing that. Evil in the sight of the Lord is not just worshiping other gods. Worshiping other gods is merely the first step towards doing evil.

We see a similar thing when the passage discusses King Amaziah of Judah. The writer tells us that he did what was pleasing in the Lord’s sight even though he did not tear down the pagan shrines and allowed the people to continue worshiping at them. Here the writer actually gives us an example of how Amaziah was a good ruler. When he was sufficiently established in power, he had the men who assassinated his father, King Joash, executed, but he did not otherwise punish their children because the Law of Moses said that people should only die for their own crimes. We have this contrast between the kings of Israel, who did evil in the Lord’s sight, and King Amaziah of Judah, who did what was pleasing in the Lord’s sight. Yet, when Amazaih initiated war against Jehoash, one of those evil kings of Israel, he lost.