I am using One Year Bible Online for my daily Bible study. For today, One Year Bible Online links here.
The first part of today’s reading is from the book of Joshua where Joshua is dividing the land of Canaan up among the tribes. One of the first things I note is the recurring theme that the Israelites failed to drive the Canaanites out of the land. God had commanded them to drive all of the Canaanites out of the promised land and had promised to do so for them. The Bible does not really tell us why God did not fully drive the Canaanites out of the land for the Israelites. However the fact that as the Israelites became strong instead of driving the Canaanites out from among them, they enslaved them, may have something to with this. This failure to drive the Canaanites out is the seed of many of Israel’s later problems.
The next part of the reading is the story of Zacchaeus and the parable of the talents from Luke 19. I have known Christians who do not associate with non-Christians. I often wonder how they expect to fulfill Jesus’ command to make disciples of all the earth if they never spend any time with those who are not already followers of Jesus. I understand that some new Christians need to avoid associating with those who would tempt them to fall back into their sinful lifestyle. But I have known long time Christians who avoid any socialization with non-Christians and who question the righteousness of those who do otherwise. As we read the Gospels, we see that Jesus spent a lot of time socializing with those considered sinners in His day. This story is yet another example of this. Zacchaeus was anxious to see this man that all the area was talking about. Jesus told Zacchaeus that He must come to Zacchaeus’ house that day. He did not say this because Zacchaeus was a righteous man, but because Zacchaeus was a sinner. The crowd was displeased with Jesus’ choice of hosts. They thought He should choose a more “appropriate” person to be His host. Zacchaeus responded to Jesus’ outreach to him by promising to change his life around. In the Torah, the law called for fourfold restitution for theft. Zacchaeus promised to not only restore fourfold to those whom he had defrauded, but to give one half of his wealth to the poor. Jesus told the crowd that He came to seek and save the lost. How can we as Christians claim to be imitating Christ if we do not also seek the lost (and hopefully, through the Spirit’s intervention, save them)?
The second part of today’s passage from Luke is one that troubles me. It is quite clear. Those who are given gifts from God (whether talents, or money, or other benefits) are expected to make good use of those gifts. I have been given quite a bit in my life both in talents and material goods, yet I have failed to make good use of those gifts for the glory of God. I have long struggled with knowing what God wants me to do, but I know that I must work at being more active in serving Him, even if I do not know what path He wishes me to follow. I have heard it said that it is easier to guide something that is in motion to the correct course than something that is stationary. I must make a stronger effort to put myself in motion, even if it is in the wrong direction, so that God may more readily guide my path.
Next we have a Psalm about Jerusalem. It is one of several interesting (and perhaps troubling) Bible passages about the importance of Jerusalem as the City of God in light of the current state of affairs in that part of the world.
The final element of today’s reading is a Proverb. I read several translations of this to get a clear idea of it. I think it is something that is important to remember. The way to wealth is to gather wealth over time, not to attempt to get it quickly or through fraud. When one looks at the lives of many retired athletes, or those who have won the lottery, one sees the truth of this Proverb.
All posts by AttilaDimedici
April 17, 2012 Bible Study
I am using One Year Bible Online for my daily Bible study. For today, One Year Bible Online links here for today. I just discovered that I used the May 17 reading for this study. I may change this to May 17 when that comes, or I may rewrite this completely on that day.
David has put together a fairly large force (600 men) and is operating in the wilderness and hill country near Ziph. Jonathan (the son and heir to King Saul) comes to David and affirms their friendship. Jonathan, also, expresses the intent to be second to David when David becomes king, even though Jonathan is the heir to the throne. Shortly after this some of the locals go to King Saul and tell him that David is hiding near them and offer to help King Saul capture him. King Saul leads a force to work with the locals to capture David. David moves into ever more remote areas and Saul follows. However, before Saul can corner David, he receives word that the Philistines are raiding elsewhere. Saul returns from pursuing David in order to drive off the Philistine raiders.
The Bible does not really tell us what David is doing during this time, besides hiding from Saul, but he must have been doing something active in order to attract an ever growing following of men. We see in this passage that David and Jonathan have maintained their close friendship despite the hostility that Jonathan’s father held towards David. Further we see how God protected David. God did not keep David completely from harm. David needed to flee from Saul, but when David reached the end of his ability to avoid Saul, God caused the Philistines to start raiding Israel forcing Saul to give up on pursuing David. The Psalm in this study is David praising God for rescuing him from Saul in this situation.
I see here in this passage that God will care for us and rescue us from our enemies (whether human or just circumstances) as long as we remain faithful to Him. It is important to remember that even when our success seems to be a result of our own actions, it is still a gift from God.
In the second section of Samuel in today’s reading we see how we should interact with those God puts in authority over us, even when they go against God’s will. God delivers Saul into David’s hand. David has an opportunity to kill Saul and end the threat to his life. David chooses not to and even feels regret that he cut the corner from Saul’s robe. I see in this passage that even when those government officials that God has put over us act in ways that are evil, we should treat them with respect as those appointed by God. I have a lot of trouble with being faithful to this. In the passage, Saul recognizes the he is the one who is acting against God’s will and asks David to promise not to carry out a vendetta against Saul’s family when David becomes king.
In the final portion of today’s passage we get some idea of what David was doing. David and his men provided protection from bandits to those who tended flocks out in the wilderness areas of Judah. When David sent some men to Nabal to request some recompense out of his plenty, Nabal responds with contempt. Nabal did not just say “no”, he called David an outlaw and a nobody. Nabal’s response was not that he would not give David’s men anything because he had not asked them for the service they did for his men. His response was that David was of no consequence and had done nothing of value. When Nabal’s wife learns of his foolishness, she rushes to make up for his churlishness before it can explode in his face and destroy both him and her. When Abigail approached David, she did so from a position of humility recognizing that David had been wronged by her husband. She recognized the danger that she and her husband and their household were in as a result of her husband’s actions and took steps to mitigate the danger. When shortly after this Nabal dies, David offers to take Abigail as his wife. This is not just David taking the opportunity to get a good wife, this is David paying Abigail back for what she had done. With the death of Nabal, in that society Abigail would have been subject to the predations of other powerful men. By marrying her David is extending his protection to her and her household.
Nabal fails to show generosity to those who have done him a service and, according to the passage, pays a steep price for it (his life). It is only through the intervention of his wife, Abigail, that the men of Nabal’s household are spared from suffering the same fate at the hand of David and his men. I take from this that it is important that we be generous to those who have done us service to the extent that our resources allow (not all of us have the wealth that Nabal had). Also, we should act with humility to defuse the anger in a situation that results when those around us are arrogant and insulting to others. Finally, we do not need to gain vengeance on those who insult and degrade us, God will punish those who are deserving of such punishment in His time and according to His will.
Bible Study
I am attempting to use this website to guide me through reading through the Bible in a year. It links to a website I find very useful for obtaining Bible references. I am going to try and blog each day on the passages that I read. If you find what I write useful, please let me know. If you have any comments about what I write, or about the scripture I am writing about, please leave me comments.
The Triumphal Entry (Luke 19:39-44)
In Luke’s account of Jesus’ entry into Jerusalem the Sunday before his crucifixion, Luke recounts how some of the Pharisees asked Jesus to rebuke his disciples. The Pharisees were concerned because the disciples were a large crowd and were obviously proclaiming that Jesus was the Messiah. There are several different ways to understand what was going on here, but I am going to give the Pharisees the benefit of the doubt (at least for this article). The Pharisees were concerned because they were afraid that those praising Jesus’ entry would rise up in revolt against the Romans. The Pharisees were afraid of how the Romans would respond to this revolt (justly so).
Jesus’ response was that if these people did not cry out to praise God, the stones would do so. In part Jesus was saying that there was an underlying desire/longing to see God move through the arrival of the Messiah that was going to break through no matter what was done to suppress that. I am not saying that the stones would not have literally cried out if the people had been silent, merely that there is more to what Jesus is saying here than just that. The Holy Spirit had been laying the groundwork and the people were ready for the moving that God had planned. The people were primed and ready to seek the will of God.
After this Jesus weeps over the city of Jerusalem. He expresses grief over what will happen to Jerusalem. This seems to me to be a response to the Pharisees, and others, resisting the movement of the Holy Spirit. There are two ways to look at this. The first is that Jesus knew the future and knew what was coming in 70 A.D. (more or less). I am comfortable with that understanding. However, the other way to look at it is that Jesus just knew people. He knew that those who rejected God’s plan would attempt to take God’s place and save themselves, with disastrous results. Jesus knew how the Romans would react to this. There is a final way to look at this. That way is that both of those are true.
The Feral Cat
When my wife and I moved into our current house, we wanted to attract a stray cat to keep mice and other vermin away. We cannot have a cat in the house because it is very small and my wife is allergic to cats. After we got settled in, we stopped by our closest neighbors house to visit. They have several cats. During our conversation, the subject of a stray cat came up. They said that they were feeding a feral cat that came around (as well as the three cats that lived with them). It was very skittish about people and would bolt at the first sign that someone was getting close. They suggested that if we would start feeding it, they would stop feeding it and it would very quickly start spending more time around our place. That sounded good to us, so the deal was struck.
So, we started feeding the cat by putting food out on our back porch. We saw it from time to time, but it was truly as skittish as our neighbors had said. If it even saw us watching it out the window in our kitchen door, off it went. Then one night after about a month or so, my wife calls me on the cellphone from our driveway (she gets home from work later than I do). She tells me to come right down, there is something I have to see. It turns out that one of our neighbors’ cats had decided to come over and sample our food. My wife was afraid of scaring him off, which is why she called me on the phone rather than coming in and getting me. She need not have worried, the cat (an orange tabby) was perfectly happy to have people around. As soon as I came down he rubbed up against my legs and demanded my attention. After a couple more months we caught yet another of our neighbors’ cats eating out of the bowl we put out for the feral cat. My wife was worried that the feral cat was not getting any to eat and wanted to put out more food. I, on the other hand, did not want to make our neighbors’ cats fat. We compromised by increasing the amount of food slightly.
On several mornings we came out to see the food bowl tipped up on its side against the chair on the porch. My wife was convinced the feral cat was threatening us, “Give me more food, or that will be you one of these nights.” All that being said, we decided that now that we had a pretty good idea how much cat food we were going through, we should buy less expensive food in larger quantities. So, we did. We got the new food and put it out one night. The next morning the bowl was tipped over completely and the food was scattered on the porch. It did not look like the cats had eaten any of it. We put the food back in the bowl and added just a little bit more. I figured once the feral cat got hungry enough it would eat the food.
After two days with the food remaining untouched, my wife wanted to buy “better” cat food but I was convinced that sooner or later the feral cat would give in and eat the food we provided. After a week I had to admit that either it was getting food somewhere else, or it was just that stubborn and would not eat the food for any reason. We decided to get some “better” food and mix it with the cheap stuff we had. The first night we did this, the next morning it appeared that the cat had picked the “good” stuff out and left most of the other food. We continued to mix the food and just did not put out as much. This appeared to work, sometimes it took a couple of days but all of the food got eaten.
Then I got lazy. Instead of mixing the two, I just put the “good” stuff on the bottom. The next morning, the bowl was tipped and the cheap stuff was scattered on the porch. Then I had an inspiration, we had a little bit of meat stock left over from a meal we made, so I put some of it over the cheap cat food. The next morning, not only was the cat bowl knocked over, it was knocked completely off the porch. But all the food was gone. That has been the procedure since then. When we prepare a meal, we keep the meat drippings or the excess stock that we will not be able to use up before it goes bad and put a little bit over the cheap cat food. We can always tell how well the offering was received. Some mornings only a little bit of the food is eaten, other mornings it is all eaten. But we can tell when we have a home run when the bowl has been knocked off the porch and all of the food is gone.
Just Starting Out
This is my first post on here. My plan is for this blog to be about whatever strikes my fancy, whether that be something factual or fictional. As time goes by, I think you will discover that I have strong opinions on many subjects. I hope to have guest writers on here from time to time and perhaps book reviews.
I would like to give you an idea of who I am. I am a Christian IT professional.