Today, I am reading and commenting on  2 Samuel 8-11.

Early in the discussion here about David’s conquests the passage mentions that he conquered the Moabites and killed 2/3rds of them (the way the passage describes how he decided who to kill and who to let live seems odd and I may be misreading how it would have worked out).  The thing about this which strikes me is that David had taken his parents to the king of Moab for protection when he was fleeing from King Saul.  In addition, his great grandmother, Ruth, was a Moabite. Yet, here he is described as killing the majority of them.  I suspect we are missing this a part of the story here.

I find it interesting that when King David asked after a descendant of King Saul whom he could be kind to in honor of Jonathan, Jonathan’s son was described as living in a town whose name could be translated as “Nowhere”.  Which makes me wonder if the name given was intended to indicate the actual town name, or to indicate that King David took Jonathan’s son from Nowheresville (as we would express it today) to the royal palace. In fact, that is the point of this story, whether Lo Debar was an actual place, or just “Nowheresville”,  this story is here to tell us that King David took Jonathan’s son from the obscurity to which his crippled state condemned him to the heights of society, all out of David’s love for Jonathan.

I use the daily Bible reading schedule from “The Bible.net” for my daily Bible reading.